Napokššš;n vas prššš;nađoh! |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |||||
The Phoenix
Fitness freak Joined: 31 Svibanj 2010 Location: Zagreb Status: Offline Points: 4250 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
nebi rekel da je to radi troškova i buđeta. Prije bi rekao da je to zabluda kao i ne jedenje poslje š8h. Kao, to je međuobork, to mora bit nešto malo za prigrist samo, neka vockica il tak nekaj,jer to je međuobrok a ne rucak ili vecera ili veci obrok....... Mislim da je u tome stvar.... |
|||||
crna_kej
Mixa shakeove Joined: 04 Rujan 2009 Location: Croatia/Hrvatska Status: Offline Points: 987 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
naravno da saka badema nije medjuobrok. moja opaska je isla na racun toga da Aretha nije gladna nakon rucka pa bi radije taj medjuobrok preskocila. Krumpir je pun skroba i razlicite su teorije koje namirnice s kojima kombinirat. |
|||||
ako zelis pobjediti, ne smijes izgubiti
|
|||||
The Phoenix
Fitness freak Joined: 31 Svibanj 2010 Location: Zagreb Status: Offline Points: 4250 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
AAAAa, ko ce više znat dal je ironija kad i ja viđam svugdje kavu li ness pod međuobrok Ma može krumpir, netreba prevec folozofirat, nema niš loše u njemu i ne vidim zakaj bi škrob bio bauk, gledam ga ko izvor uh ko i svaki drugi sa svojim nutritivnim svojstvima kojih nema drugdje. Ak ga ne jedeš kaj ti preostaje, samo tijeto i riža kao izvor uh. Ovak jednom rižu, jednom krumpir, jednom tijesto, pa batat, pa grah, i tak to....... |
|||||
crna_kej
Mixa shakeove Joined: 04 Rujan 2009 Location: Croatia/Hrvatska Status: Offline Points: 987 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
|
|||||
ako zelis pobjediti, ne smijes izgubiti
|
|||||
The Phoenix
Fitness freak Joined: 31 Svibanj 2010 Location: Zagreb Status: Offline Points: 4250 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
koristit slazem se za raznovrsnost[/QUOTE] Definitivno jer po onim ispada da si bila full ozbiljna Misunderstood Carbs There are many fantastic carbohydrate sources out there that seem to have fallen off most bodybuilder's radars. Two perfect examples are potatoes, replaced by sweet potatoes, and wild rice, replaced by brown. Now those replacements are fine foods, but are they really any better than the foods they're substituted for? Not really. White Potatoes White potatoes have gotten a bad rap recently, mainly due to their high glycemic index, which is higher than the more celebrated sweet potato. But really, who cares? You aren't eating a white potato all by its lonesome, so that T-bone and steamed veggies with it, along with the pastured butter inside it, will slow its digestion anyway, making that point rather irrelevant. All the talk about garbage white potatoes and saintly sweet potatoes has been taken a little far. Sweet potatoes are awesome, but white potatoes have more iron, magnesium and potassium than sweet potatoes, and they're one of the most satiating foods on the planet. They pack a lot of calories into a small package, were a staple of the old-school crowd, and have helped thousands of lifters pack on some serious mass. They're also a good source of š2 vitamins and minerals, and provide 7 g of both fiber and complete protein in each large one. Wild Rice Wild rice has become a barely spoken word in bodybuilding and even health-conscious circles these days. Is brown rice actually any better? They're both good sources of 8 vitamins and minerals; wild has 3 g of fiber and 7 g of protein in š cooked cup, while brown has 4 g of fiber and 5 g of protein. Does anybody see a significant difference there? I would say wild is every bit as good, plus offers a nice change to the palate for your much-neglected taste buds. And really, did a little variety ever hurt anyone? |
|||||
crna_kej
Mixa shakeove Joined: 04 Rujan 2009 Location: Croatia/Hrvatska Status: Offline Points: 987 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Definitivno jer po onim ispada da si bila full ozbiljna Misunderstood Carbs There are many fantastic carbohydrate sources out there that seem to have fallen off most bodybuilder's radars. Two perfect examples are potatoes, replaced by sweet potatoes, and wild rice, replaced by brown. Now those replacements are fine foods, but are they really any better than the foods they're substituted for? Not really. White Potatoes White potatoes have gotten a bad rap recently, mainly due to their high glycemic index, which is higher than the more celebrated sweet potato. But really, who cares? You aren't eating a white potato all by its lonesome, so that T-bone and steamed veggies with it, along with the pastured butter inside it, will slow its digestion anyway, making that point rather irrelevant. All the talk about garbage white potatoes and saintly sweet potatoes has been taken a little far. Sweet potatoes are awesome, but white potatoes have more iron, magnesium and potassium than sweet potatoes, and they're one of the most satiating foods on the planet. They pack a lot of calories into a small package, were a staple of the old-school crowd, and have helped thousands of lifters pack on some serious mass. They're also a good source of š2 vitamins and minerals, and provide 7 g of both fiber and complete protein in each large one. Wild Rice Wild rice has become a barely spoken word in bodybuilding and even health-conscious circles these days. Is brown rice actually any better? They're both good sources of 8 vitamins and minerals; wild has 3 g of fiber and 7 g of protein in š cooked cup, while brown has 4 g of fiber and 5 g of protein. Does anybody see a significant difference there? I would say wild is every bit as good, plus offers a nice change to the palate for your much-neglected taste buds. And really, did a little variety ever hurt anyone?[/QUOTE] nisam procitala jer mi danas treba posebna koncentracija i moc s obzirom da paralelno vodim razgovore i ovdje tipkam al mislim da znam na sto te referira. citala sam nedavno (citaj proslo mi pred oci) neku studiju koja pokazuje da se ne treba "bojat" krumpira jer njegovi benefiti su toliki da se moze i njime mrsavit..
Vise cu pisat po forumu pa ces vidjet da mois ozbiljna ne postoji ja sam jos veselo dete |
|||||
ako zelis pobjediti, ne smijes izgubiti
|
|||||
crna_kej
Mixa shakeove Joined: 04 Rujan 2009 Location: Croatia/Hrvatska Status: Offline Points: 987 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Definitivno jer po onim ispada da si bila full ozbiljna Misunderstood Carbs There are many fantastic carbohydrate sources out there that seem to have fallen off most bodybuilder's radars. Two perfect examples are potatoes, replaced by sweet potatoes, and wild rice, replaced by brown. Now those replacements are fine foods, but are they really any better than the foods they're substituted for? Not really. White Potatoes White potatoes have gotten a bad rap recently, mainly due to their high glycemic index, which is higher than the more celebrated sweet potato. But really, who cares? You aren't eating a white potato all by its lonesome, so that T-bone and steamed veggies with it, along with the pastured butter inside it, will slow its digestion anyway, making that point rather irrelevant. All the talk about garbage white potatoes and saintly sweet potatoes has been taken a little far. Sweet potatoes are awesome, but white potatoes have more iron, magnesium and potassium than sweet potatoes, and they're one of the most satiating foods on the planet. They pack a lot of calories into a small package, were a staple of the old-school crowd, and have helped thousands of lifters pack on some serious mass. They're also a good source of š2 vitamins and minerals, and provide 7 g of both fiber and complete protein in each large one. Wild Rice Wild rice has become a barely spoken word in bodybuilding and even health-conscious circles these days. Is brown rice actually any better? They're both good sources of 8 vitamins and minerals; wild has 3 g of fiber and 7 g of protein in š cooked cup, while brown has 4 g of fiber and 5 g of protein. Does anybody see a significant difference there? I would say wild is every bit as good, plus offers a nice change to the palate for your much-neglected taste buds. And really, did a little variety ever hurt anyone?[/QUOTE]
Ne znam dal ce modovi "hapsit".. ipak je ovo Arethina tema ali.. kopiram link za krumpir.. http://www.zdravakrava.hr/clanak/šš24/uz-krumpir-oguli-kilog rame |
|||||
ako zelis pobjediti, ne smijes izgubiti
|
|||||
The Phoenix
Fitness freak Joined: 31 Svibanj 2010 Location: Zagreb Status: Offline Points: 4250 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Pa nije full offtopic, raspravljamo vezano za njen menu di
si ju zašptala za krumpir Evo u linku ti piše, ne jedenje krumpira je ženska zabluda i to je to |
|||||
crna_kej
Mixa shakeove Joined: 04 Rujan 2009 Location: Croatia/Hrvatska Status: Offline Points: 987 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
|
|||||
ako zelis pobjediti, ne smijes izgubiti
|
|||||
The Phoenix
Fitness freak Joined: 31 Svibanj 2010 Location: Zagreb Status: Offline Points: 4250 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Ma daj, to je opet neki ženski mit |
|||||
Aretha
Cita FAQ Joined: 24 Listopad 2010 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Ah,tek sam sad skužila da ste se u lijepu raspravu oko moje kave i krumpira upustili! Neka,neka,drago mi je što pokušavate pomoc. Al moram i ja reagirat i pojasnit popodnevnu kavu-znam da to nije međuobrok,kojeg izbjegavam jer jednostavno nisam gladna,nažalost! Evo npr. jucer, u š6h rucala b. meso na žaru, quinou s cvjetacom i radic. Poslije rucka š,5h usisavanja, i još kojekakvog pospremanja, pa 45 min vježbanja umjerenog intenziteta, uglavnom nije bilo sjedenja i izležavanja, a ogladnila sam tek u 22h!! To je cijelih 6 sati. I onda nemam ni volje vecerat kad idem spavat za sat vremena. Je li to do metabolizma ili cega? Kako to promijeniti? |
|||||
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |